Showing posts with label kid films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label kid films. Show all posts

Saturday, April 18, 2009

The Seeker: The Dark is Rising

Hi Aki,

Today I watched The Seeker: The Dark is Rising which is adapted from Susan Cooper’s YA novel The Dark is Rising. Cooper’s book is one of a series of 5 novels she published back in the 1960s and 70s. The adaptation is Fox Studio’s entry in the ‘Harry Potter Blockbuster Series Imitation’ sweepstakes but, like New Line’s The Golden Compass, is probably destined to be a one-shot money loser.

The story has the Stanton family in England from their native California. Will is the youngest of a big brood of 6 brothers and one sister. His brothers pick on him, and when he gets home from school for Christmas term break, he finds that his second-oldest brother has come back from college and has taken over his room. Well he’s not going to move in with the twins who are always picking on him, so he puts a futon up in the attic of the old house.

Strange things are happening in town, though, and Will is starting to see some strange things – usually swirling shapes in patterns. And there is a man all dressed in black who rides around town on a white horse, and stops Will on the road and demands that he hand over ‘the Signs.’ But Will doesn’t know what these are.

The answer is soon to come as the people of the Manor house take Will into an ancient church and tell him they are the Old Ones, who have been fighting on behalf of the Light against the Dark in an age-old struggle. Will they claim is an Old One himself, in fact the all-important Seeker – the one who can read The Book and know the Signs. Six Signs there are, hidden over the ages from the Rider who is the incarnation or representative of the Dark. The Rider’s powers are growing, for it is the time of the age once more when the Dark will rise and threaten to overwhelm the world, unless the Old Ones can assemble all Six Signs and use their power to counter the Rider. The Signs are made of different elements like glass, wood, iron; but the sixth Sign is in a human soul, and can never be found. On top of all this, Will can go through time to find the Signs where they were hidden. And there are only 5 days before the Rider’s powers will be at their peak, and if the Signs are not found before then, the world will be done for.

Well Will doesn’t believe this, but the Rider comes again, and the representatives and allies of the Rider, and there are thousands of black crows over the town, and the Old Ones walk Will from winter into spring, so what’s so hard to believe? One by one Will finds the signs; he sees the swirling fractal pattern glowing, and walks through time into the past, and retrieves the Signs.

But even members of Will’s family, and even the girl he’s got the hots for, can be tempted by the Rider into betraying Will. And though Will gets the five elemental Signs, how on earth will he find the Sign that cannot be found?

Of course there is a happy ending and young Will Stanton, the Seeker, uses his growing super powers to defeat the Rider and save the town and the world from snow and ice and dark. But it isn’t the end. The age is still one of conflicts, and there will be more battles ahead for … the Seeker!!!

The movie makes several crucial changes from the novel. It’s a while since I read Cooper’s books, so I only know a bit of the changes they made. The basic one, that sums up all the others, is that Cooper told of a family of Londoners who were on vacation in a small town in England, a quaint old place where they had some relatives. But Hollywood is sure that American kids can’t sympathize with British kids, Harry Potter notwithstanding, so Fox has to have a California Stanton pack.

And in the book Will didn’t have the super powers – or not so much anyway – and he was humble. But Americans today aren’t humble, if we ever were, and Hollywood wants to pander to our self-deceptions, and feed our egos. So Will is American, he is the Destined One, the Chosen One, and a Superboy all in one.

The books have their faults. It’s quite difficult to show a world of fantasy coexisting with our modern world; in fact I don’t think anybody succeeded in doing so before Joanne Rowling. In addition, The Dark is Rising is hard to film because it’s a puzzle tale: six signs have been hidden about the town, and all six must be found. That makes for six sequences of clues and discovery, on top of which there must be a couple of opening sequences to show Will in his status quo ante and learning who and what he is, and then coming to terms with it, and a climactic battle scene. It makes for a movie with about 10 sequences, all of them involving flashy special effects, and a huge budget with a long running time.

Fox chose instead to short-change the puzzle sequences, making them very short, which makes the puzzles seem easy, and not true puzzle at all: Will is just going along, suddenly sees the swirling fractal pattern, and boom! – he’s in the past and sees a Sign, grabs it with a bit of a struggle, and boom! – he’s back in the present.

But each of the sequences, almost all the scenes in fact, are packed with typical Hollywood digital effects. And the director tries to shoot everything to make it look ‘magical’ so it’s all pretty crazy to look at. This movie almost qualifies in the ‘looks great, stupid script’ line of films I started keeping track of when I first noticed that The Avengers looked cool and awesome with the sound turned off. (Tomb Raider is another in that line.) But The Seeker: the Dark is Rising doesn’t look good enough to quite qualify, and the cutting is so crazy (probably to bring it in with a short running time; there are something like 3 credited editors) that I couldn’t really enjoy the production design and effects anyway.

In the end the most damning thing I can say of this movie is how bland and generic Fox has made it. If they wanted just to imitate Harry Potter, why not come up with their own script property – surely 50-year-old minor British books aren’t famous enough to warrant this treatment, and the rights to the book must be less than the shoot’s craft services budget – paltry in comparison to the hundred, two hundred million dollars or so it cost Fox to develop, shoot, post and launch it (and it only grossed 8 million in North America, and 22 million abroad, for a really dreadful 31 million dollars total – somebody for sure got fired for this one).

Nobody in power understood that the charm in Cooper’s book lay in the specificity of the time and place, and the humble and unassuming nature of the tale, meant to be read over a school break to while away boredom of being shut in while the bad weather raged outside.

Just a waste, in fact.

(16 April 2009)

Sunday, March 8, 2009

10,000 BC

Hi Aki,

So I watched 10,000 BC and liked it a lot more than I expected to. In fact, I did actually like it!

Omar Shariff does the narration. I have always liked him and he’s been in a few movies I love, so it’s just so nice to hear his voice. There are moments when his age shows in the voice, which is too bad, but other moments when his pleasure in just telling the story is powerful.

The cast is mostly unknown to me. This is good. Distracting to see Brad Pitt as Achilles in Troy, but here there was no ‘that’s a movie star in a loin cloth!’ objection.

Another good thing about the cast is that there were so many different ethnicities (no Asians, alas, even though it takes place in Asia, I guess – but central Asia from Siberia down to say Iraq or Egypt). This gave it an exotic look that helped to transport me into its foreign world.

There were lots of surprises in the movie. The central story is a quest: raiders take slaves from a small tribe far in the snowy north, including a girl beloved by the hero. So he and a couple friends go to rescue her. Every 15 minutes the landscape changes completely from snowy mountains to jungle, to savannah, to desert, to arid plain. And each new tribe/culture the rescuers meet is a different kind and level of civilization, mostly getting more and more sophistication until they run into the descendents of Atlantis – or are they aliens landed on earth?

This means it’s not easy to get bored. If you don’t like one setting, hold on – it will change.

Of course a movie like this is impossible without massive budgets and digital effects, and the digital stuff looked very good at least on a television.

There was not much to recommend the acting. A Roland Emmerich movie is not written to give the actors much emotions to emote, it’s mostly action. Only the narrator got to really go to town, and one old lady from the siberian tribes, their wise woman, who accompanied the rescuers through visions, helping when she could in a semi-mystical way.

The ending is cheesy of course, because it’s Roland Emmerich! And it’s for kids! And there are multiple problems if you try to think, and consider it as actually representing any past epoch on earth. The Siberians hunt wooly mammoths and yet believe it’s impossible to leave their valley – but the mammoths come and go? Men ride horses thousands of years before horses were bred big enough to support a man. Men from the far north are wandering across deep desert in equatorial regions without even getting sunburned. And so on.

But this is a kids’ movie, and you have to just put aside your brain when you go in the theater and let it take you wherever it wants to go, and enjoy it for what it is.

In North America the movie was ill-served by the ad campaign, which just went for cheap thrills without communicating the unfolding sense of wonder the film gives. They showed some of the different cultures in a way that just looked like a stew of random elements thrown together in the commercial; but in the movie, Emmerich takes us carefully from one place to a slightly-different place, to one even more different, so it seems more organic.

Quest For Fire is an obvious inspiration, and this movie just can’t compare to that one – quest is a masterpiece compared to this. Quest was also a serious effort to depict what it might have been like before agriculture, at the end of the last ice age. This one is trashy fun, and for what it is, it’s very good.

(written around 8 March 2009)